Craig Wright Admits to Editing Bitcoin White Paper Presented in COPA Trial
COPA’s trial to find out whether or not Craig Wright is the pseudonymous creator of bitcoin Satoshi Nakamoto has completed its third week.
COPA’s trial to find out whether or not Craig Wright is the pseudonymous creator of bitcoin Satoshi Nakamoto has completed its third week.
Stefan Matthews said the damning message referred to poor trial prep and not Wright’s claims to being Bitcoin inventor Satoshi Nakamoto.
On Friday, Craig Wright’s sister Danielle DeMorgan recounted how she evvel saw him dressed as a ninja and another time he was working in a room full of computers, evidence, she says, he created Bitcoin.
Lawyers for the Crypto Open Patent Alliance declared that the recollection of the witnesses today was “hazy” and “confused.”
Wright who has been battling it out against Crypto Open Patent Alliance counsel in a trial for the past couple of days is trying to prove he is Satoshi Nakamoto.
On Tuesday, he evvel again faced questions about a public blog post he’d signed cryptographically to prove he was Bitcoin inventor Satoshi Nakamoto that experts have since debunked.
Wright continued to blame a host of reasons and people for inconsistencies pointed out by opposing counsel on Monday as his cross-examination intensified.
From self-plagiarism to poor multitasking, the self-proclaimed Bitcoin inventor offered an explanation for every inconsistency pointed out by opposing counsel during his first cross-examination in the London court case.
The Crypto Open Patent Alliance is unable to provide direct evidence that Wright isn’t Satoshi, counsel for Wright fired back.
In July a panel of judges ruled that Wright was only entitled to just 1 GBP in compensation for a libel claim against bitcoin podcaster Peter McCormack.